Sub-Score Breakdown
Score History
Latest Signals
{
"forks": 5459,
"stars": 36161,
"openIssues": 832,
"starsGrowth30d": 723,
"lastReleaseDate": "2026-06-19T00:24:00Z",
"commitFrequency90d": 0.23
}{
"avgSentiment": -0.343,
"totalPoints30d": 1196,
"commentCount30d": 587,
"frontPageHits30d": 5
}{
"latestVersion": "v2.0.0-vscode",
"releasesLast90d": 0,
"daysSinceLastRelease": 113
}{
"paperCount": 50,
"recentPapers30d": 50
}{
"forks": 5459,
"stars": 36161,
"openIssues": 832,
"starsGrowth30d": 723,
"lastReleaseDate": "2026-06-19T00:24:00Z",
"commitFrequency90d": 0.23
}{
"paperCount": 50,
"recentPapers30d": 50
}Comparisons
AutoGPT and Continue are nearly tied overall (85.99 vs 85.66 RadarScore), but differ notably across sub-dimensions. AutoGPT leads on enterprise readiness (100 vs 65.32) and recency (99.26 vs 95.74), while Continue leads on buzz (100 vs 75) and developer sentiment (67.25 vs 55.7). Both tools share identical adoption momentum scores of 100.
Continue leads overall with a RadarScore of 85.66 vs Dify's 85.02, driven by a perfect buzz score (100 vs 76.25) and higher recency (95.74 vs 85.74). However, Dify holds a decisive advantage in enterprise readiness (100 vs 65.32), while both tools are tied on adoption momentum at 100. Developer sentiment is marginally higher for Continue (67.25 vs 63.1).
Continue and Dify are nearly matched with RadarScores of 85.48 and 85.11 respectively, but serve different purposes - Continue focuses on coding assistance while Dify specializes in AI agents. Continue shows stronger buzz and recency metrics, while Dify excels in enterprise readiness with a perfect score of 100 compared to Continue's 65.21.